Below you may read an unedited transcript of a presentation* about the Gulen Movement which provides valuable insight and a concise overview:
Gulen Movement: An Overview
I would like to begin by thanking the Center for Strategic and International Studies for hosting this presentation and in particular Dr. Aliriza for his invitation and organizing this gathering.
I also have a couple of disclaimers: First, I will not be speaking on behalf of any institution. The views presented here belong solely to me personally and do not represent in any way the official position of any institution or the Movement in general.
Secondly, I do not come here as an expert on but as a keen student of Turkish history, politics and society, and also as a person whose cultural understanding has been influenced by the service ethics of the Gulen Movement.
My presentation will include the following:
1. An attempt at description and a short historical overview of the Movement’s development.
2. The values and ideals of the Movement participants.
3. Fields of activity, institutions and organizations that are considered within the Movement.
4. Participation and fundraising mechanisms.
5. Cultural and social dynamics that underlie the growth of the Movement.
6. The views of Gulen or Movement participants on key issues such as democracy, secularism, Turkey’s European Union membership, women’s roles, the Kurdish issue, the Alevi issue, religious minorities and interfaith dialogue, nonviolence, and harmony of science and arts.
Let me start with an attempt to describe the Movement.
Description and Historical Background
The so-called Gulen Movement is a civil society movement. It started out as a local service effort with a group of students, teachers, parents, and small business owners around the Turkish scholar and preacher Fethullah Gulen in the city of Izmir in Turkey. For ease of reference, it is now mostly referred, especially by western scholars , to as the Gulen Movement, due to its main source of inspiration. By its participants, however, it is often called hizmet, or volunteer services. As far as Mr. Gulen is concerned, he prefers to refer to it as “the movement of humans united around high human values.”
The Movement originated in late 1960s Turkey as a faith-based (or Islam-inspired) initiative around creating educational opportunities in the form of scholarships, dormitories, schools and tutoring centers. Over the four decades since then, it has grown into a transnational educational, intercultural and interfaith movement, with participants numbering in the millions, comprising of hundreds of foundations, companies, professional associations, formal and informal, but legal, associations of various kinds.
The first group of people who associated with Gulen were college students, local mosque-goers, audiences who attended open-to-all question and answer sessions, seminars, and café meetings.The students at the Kestane Pazari dormitory/tutoring center in Izmir where Gulen served as the director were also very important at the early stages of the development of the Movement. In this stage, in addition to public speeches, Gulen attendedconversation circles where values and ideals like promoting and investing in sound education were discussed. In the following years, institutions were founded by educators and business owners inspired by Gulen’s constant encouragement for investing in education. These institutions include dormitories, K-12 schools, and tutoring centers. In the next stage of the Movement, media organizations were encouraged and established. And the media organizations began to serve as a continuation of the educational initiative for the masses. In addition, professional associations and intellectual/cultural organizations were formed in different locations by like-minded individuals. After the collapse of the iron curtain in the late 1980s, with the educational institutions established and run there, the Movement became transnational, expanding particularly into the Central Asian states with Turkic cultural background. In parallel to the institutionalization and transnationalization, the Movement heavily engaged in interfaith dialogue, in anticipation and prevention of the so-called clash theories that would be promoted by others after a while.
Today, although there is no central head quarters of registry, based on the media coverage, it is estimated that hundreds of schools exist in Turkey in addition to a similar number of such institutions in five continents. They all are inspired by Gulen’s peaceful life and works. In every city and town of Turkey, it is possible to encounter an educational facility or other cultural activity that can be associated with or inspired by the Movement. The Movement grew from a handful of individuals around Gulen in the late 1960s to millions in the 2000s. It is obviously impossible for Gulen to personally meet or know all participants of the Movement. How did this happen? What was so attractive to the Turkish people who came in contact with the Movement?
Message and Attraction
In the late 1960s, or early 1970s, Gulen’s message of deep and practiced faith, altruism and action was being delivered against abackdrop of poverty, corruption and moral decay. Non-democratic interventions on democracy, restriction of religious expression in public life, political and ideological clashes were prevalent. Tensions among the Sunni and Alevi, Turkish and Kurdish, and practicing Muslim versus secular nonpracticing citizens were high. But most importantly, politically/ideologically motivated armed clashes among “communists”, “fascists”, etc. resulted in the deaths of thousands of youth on the streets. In addition, assumed tensions between modernity and tradition and a multitude of other problems besieged the educational system.
What appealed to the first audiences was Gulen’s comprehensive approach to individuals, society, the nation and humanity in general. Gulen identified poverty, rivalries (schisms in Turkey), and lack of sound education as the main problems plaguing the nation. In particular, Gulen represented and taught the following:
1. Reforming oneself and thus becoming a better believer and practitioner of faith. When examined, it can easily be determined that Gulen’s rhetoric focused on this aspect the most.
2. Serving something greater than yourself. Do not simply care for your own interest, but strive toward a greater vision. Why not a more prestigious Turkey? Why not a humanity in peace? According to Aydin Bolak, the late chairman of Turkish Petroleum Foundation and Turkish Education Foundation, Gulen gave a
new vision to the Turkish youth who were getting trained in fulfilling their personal interests/objectives.
3. Education is the key to the solution of our main problems: Ignorance, division, poverty. And the key to making education work for the better is to have teachers and administrators who “represent” (temsil in Turkish) the values cherished by the people. Invest in education. If you are young, able and willing, choose
teaching as your profession. If you are a business person, support a school financially. If you are a parent, encourage sound education and for that help build a school in your neighborhood. In short, there is a way of contribution to educational initiatives for every person. Later other initiatives, such as media, hospitals, disaster relief and poverty assistance were initiated, and appealed to every segment of the population.
4. Not expecting everything from government. As a participant in a civil initiative, do something yourself, and do not delegate your responsibilities totally to the government, in similar tone to Kennedy’s famous saying “ask not what your country can do for you, but as what you can do for your country.” If you are a business person, do business, form partnerships and holdings, become rich and give charitably, with no expectation in return, back to your community.
5. As opposed to isolation from or being reactionary to public life,being present at every institution of our society with the intention to serve, including the judiciary, bureaucracy, military, media, art and business. The observant citizens of the country have shunned these institutions out of assumed pietistic concerns. They tended to send their children mostly to Qur’an courses and Imam/preacher schools. As a consequence, their expectations or worldview have been seldom valued or represented in the state or public institutions.
6. A successful synthesis or integration of religion, modernity, patriotism, democracy, science, arts, secularism and positive action. According to Bolak, Gulen’s combination of faith, spirituality and sciences offered the best expression of Turkish understanding of Islam.
7. Outreach, inclusiveness, outward looking, integrationist. From a community to a Movement, from the transnational Movement to whole humanity. Accepting everybody as they are, in their respective position.
As for the success of the Movement, certain factors play a key role:
1. Mainstream nature: The Movement participants are not different from the mainstream population of Turkey in terms of ethnicity, culture, religion, social class, and attitudes toward violence. Entry and exit is free and possible for all. It is an open project to anyone who wants to become part of it. Association and disassociation are completely voluntary.
2. Certain principles of the Movement participants were very appealing to the average citizen. These principles include:
• Altruism and the absence of self-interest. Gulen set an example by not owning any wealth or property and even discouraging his relatives from pursuing wealth (see Faruk Mercan).
• Trust and independence: There has never been a credible suspicion of financial self-interest or foreign aid or intervention.
• Abiding by the law has always been a key principle. Respect for the state and democratic views as was also noted by Mr. Gulen's audience who saw their state as essentially legitimate despite concerns around corruption and oppressive policies.
• Another important principle was non-partisanship. There was no allowance for division for any political reason. The Movement always had a comprehensive perspective in which every fellow citizen is seen as a potential future participant. Gulen refused proposals to support a particular political party or a candidate on every such occasion.
Values and Ideals
The values Gulen discussed and promoted can be gleamed from the titles of the series of articles he wrote for popular magazines or from the titles of his transcribed sermons and talks. Some of these values include deep-conscious faith, altruism, equity, tolerance, love, hope, modesty, chivalry, the complementary nature of science, rationality and spirituality, interfaith dialogue, and freedom of thought.
A look at the list of sermon series by Gulen may give a better idea:
The book entitled “The Statue of Our Souls” is a good representative of some of the values that have been promoted by Gulen.
Fields of activity, institutions and organizations encouraged/inspired/established by the Movement participants
The Movement participants inspired by Gulen’s thought, writings and sermons have set up charitable foundations and companies that are active in the fields of education, media, health care, disaster relief and business. They are all ‘decentralized’:
Participation and Fundraising Mechanisms
New participants of the Movement get to know about the Movement through multiple paths. These include the following:
1. Personal or interpersonal relationships, social networking, that is through meeting business owners, women or people of various professions who are among participants of the Movement. Some of these encounters involve an invitation to a once-a-week tea party in which spiritual topics are discussed.
2. At college and in college prep centers, while staying with fellow students in houses and dormitories.
3. By meeting with the members of professional organizations established by participants of the Movement.
4. Through publications, audio cassettes and videos, and media institutions, such as Samanyolu TV (a national TV channel), local TV channels, or Zaman newspaper and radio stations.
5. By participating in a social service campaign such as a disaster relief, health screening and scholarship activity organized by Kimse Yok Mu relief organization.
The Movement has been very careful to reject any governmental help or financial contribution from foreign foundations to maintain independence and civic nature of the projects. The main fundraising mechanism of the Movement is a meeting called “himmet” which could be translated as “donation pledge.” This is very similar to the notion of a fundraising dinner in the western world. It is usually held during the month of Ramadan in since it is believed that virtuous charitable acts are more valuable during this holy month. In such a meeting, participants make a financial or in-kind contribution pledge to an institution, such as a foundation, of the Movement. (For a sociological study of the process of giving, please see the book by Dr. Helen R. Ebaugh)
Other fundraising mechanisms include separate pledge drives for student scholarships, sacrificial animal pledges, and bake-sale (kermes) type events organized by women.
Everybody gives: It is a principle within the Movement that everybody contributes something of their time and financial resources. For a businessman, a typical contribution rate of 10% may mean a million dollar a year. In addition to financial pledges, the businesspeople are encouraged to do outreach visits to other business people and introduce the Movement projects. For a blue-collar worker, a 5% pledge may mean fifty dollars a month. No one is obliged or coerced to give. All donations or contributions are voluntary and recorded by the institution it was donated to, but not a central board or committee of the whole Movement
Participation in the Movement activities are totally voluntary and there is no official membership. Volunteers participate in the Movement through:
1. Making financial contributions
2. Volunteering their time or performing their profession pro bono for some time but not all
3. Bake-sale (kermes) organizations by women,
4. Doing outreach visits, and
5. Hosting guests or meetings in their homes.
Cultural and social dynamics that underlie the growth of the movement
The Movement’s fast growth from a few individuals to millions within four decades can be attributed to what I call the “crystallization effect.” If you remember the high school days and the over saturation experiment, then you will understand what I mean. If a cup of water is heated continuously, it can absorb increasing quantities of sugar. If this cup is then cooled down, and a sugar piece is held in the center, a crystal formation begins around this seed. It then grows until all the sugar that in the water but in excess of its capacity crystallizes around the seed. Gulen’s effect on the Turkish people can be likened to this process. The values championed by Gulen are not new to his audiences. Values such as faith, altruism, taking Prophet’s life as a model, valuing science, dialogue, tolerance, brotherhood-sisterhood, and striving together for a better society are values that are dear to the Anatolian people's heart. Even mechanisms of association and participation such as sohbet and himmet are not new. Their roots can be traced to such religious values as adanmislik, zakah, sadaqah, karz-ı hasen, sohbet (motivational or inspirational gatherings around tea or coffee).
The Movement can be described as a collection of millions of individuals with multiple voluntary associations in hundreds and thousands of foundations, companies, professional associations, and intellectual and cultural organizations. The unifying theme among these institutions, in other words what makes them a ‘Movement organization’ is their shared values and ideals.
Some of these institutions collaborate to improve efficiency. For instance, foundations in a particular city may meet to together designate specific areas of activity to avoid duplication of effort or inefficiency.
Noteworthy Stances of Gulen
1. Public condemnation of 9/11 and BinLaden thorugh media interviews and his books.
2. Promotion of education for girls even at the expense of headscarf.
3. Ascension of Turkey to the European Union. Cooperation of civilizations.
4. No return from democracy.
5. Women can have any role in the society, including judge and president.
6. Nonviolence since the inception of the Movement, that is since 1970s.
7. Interfaith dialogue initiative.
8. Spiritual depth in faith. Called a modern day Rumi by Sefik Can.
9. Harmony of science and faith.
Views of the participants of the Movement on key issues
Participants of the Movement see the state as the guarantor of order in the society, individual rights, human rights, justice and equity.
Fethullah Gulen on a number of occasions repeated his belief thatthere will be no return from democracy. “An atheist should be able to live as such without worry, and a believer should be able to live his religious life fully.” (See Mehmet Gundem interview 2005.) He suggests that democracy is the best form of government devised by humankind. Democracy will continue to improve itself and for countries such as Turkey where democracy is not well established, the strengthening of democracy will provide the ultimate opportunity for development and freedom.
It would be fair to say that the Movement participants would welcome a secularism policy like that of the United States. Those who live in Europe and the United States are happy to be contributing residents/citizens to their respective societies.
Turkey’s EU membership
The Movement participants are predominantly pro-EU due to their expectations of the strengthening of democracy at the expense of non-democratic manipulation of politics, increased transparency and decreased corruption, better economic competition and improved standards of living.
Gulen has stated on a number of occasions that in the Turkish religious interpretation of Islam which is informed essentially by the Hanefi school, women can hold any position in a society including judges, ministers, prime ministers and presidents. There is no profession that is beyond limits for women. However, some professions are not seen as ideal for women such as military combat.
Women actively participate in every institution associated with the Movement, such as teacher or administrators in schools, columnists, producers or directors in media institutions, doctors in hospitals.
The Kurdish issue
On the Kurdish issue, Gulen’s views can be summarized as a combination of four factors:
1. Addressing of the grievances of the population
2. Emphasizing common cultural elements
3. Promoting education and economic development.
4. Consulting with opinion leaders
5. Balancing diplomacy and the use of force
The Alevi issue
Gulen promotes building cemevis (houses of gathering of Alevis) along mosques where there is an Alevi community. Gulen also promotes the documentation of the oral Alevi tradition for preventing possible abuse for political reasons.
Religious minorities and interfaith dialogue
Gulen has been a pioneer of interfaith dialogue in Turkey and abroad. Just remember the fact that Turkey got its independence after the WW1, after a troubled period of state formation, and after having had to fight a war against non-Muslim nations. In the 1990s, several years before 9/11 Gulen promoted interfaith dialog saying that leaders of faith communities, they needed to show solidarity to demonstrate that religion is not and should not be a reason for conflict. He met and co-organized events with the leaders of Greek Orthodox, Armenian Orthodox, Jewish and other faith communities in Turkey. To this day, he remains close friends with them.
Gulen’s efforts served as opening a new page for interfaith relations in Turkey from suspicion into collaboration. The state Directorate for Religious Affairs established an office for interfaith dialogue. Prime Minister’s office, universities and city governments participated in interfaith activities after these initiatives. Due to the significance of his initiatives, he received a personal audience with the late Pope John Paul II. These brave moves were not without a cost. Gulen was criticized by radical circles as a hidden Christian, or a hidden cardinal of Rome.
Gulen’s stance against violence has been consistent since the 1970s. During the political anarchy years, Gulen consistently denounced terror, anarchy and violence and instructed his audiences to never respond to violence in kind. During the first Gulf War, he protested Saddam’s rockets targeting Israeli civilians in his mosque sermons in the presence of thousands of Muslims. After 9/11 he condemned the attack with an advertisement in the Washington Post. He called Bin Laden a monster along with people around him. He condemned Bin Laden’s actions on humanitarian as well as religious grounds.
Science and arts
Gulen has promoted science and arts in multiple works. In his work entitled “The Statue of Our Souls” he describes new horizons for arts and science as ideals for the new generations.
Gulen promoted patriotism over racism. His approach has been inclusive, positive, affinity-based national pride, and not antagonist. There are many Kurdish participants in the Movement. Gulen emphasizes the positive role of Turkish nation in the world, inclusive of all ethnicities of Anatolia.
* by Dr. Alp Y. Aslandoğan, President of Alliance for Shared Values - June 17, 2009